tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315386763198461000.post2677391458360641906..comments2023-09-11T00:19:16.089-07:00Comments on Just because: Comparing Aviation and Nuclear Power's Safety Record for 2014Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07222285661645557609noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315386763198461000.post-77928990106011875952014-12-27T10:10:41.047-08:002014-12-27T10:10:41.047-08:00Thanks, I'll keep working at it.Thanks, I'll keep working at it. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07222285661645557609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315386763198461000.post-79932862031864733482014-12-26T17:44:38.479-08:002014-12-26T17:44:38.479-08:00Your right I missed a zero. Thanks for pointing i...Your right I missed a zero. Thanks for pointing it out. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07222285661645557609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315386763198461000.post-13244510348686177392014-12-26T16:34:09.175-08:002014-12-26T16:34:09.175-08:00This is an interesting overall comparison for one ...This is an interesting overall comparison for one year. I don't think that many will be persuaded by it since most who are skeptical of Nuclear can point to the 3 big accidents and they believe that these show thousands to millions of deaths. There is also the point that we accept more risk when we choose the risk than when someone else is imposing it on us, (or at least appears to be imposing it on us). <br /><br />So the question is, how do we show people that Nuclear is essentially NOT imposing a health risk of any kind? <br /><br />Secondly, there is the property thing. Even though there is minor or NO health risk people feel more badly about loosing property than about loosing a loved one. The evacuations cause more fear than the cancer, in my opinion. <br /><br />I think you are on there right track, keep publishing! Davidnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315386763198461000.post-25012295888469658712014-12-26T16:27:43.531-08:002014-12-26T16:27:43.531-08:00"1,000 nSv = 1 µSv, 1,000 µSv = 1 mSv, and 1..."1,000 nSv = 1 µSv, 1,000 µSv = 1 mSv, and 1,00 mSv = 1Sv. Sv stands for Sievert which is a unit used to measure the effect of low levels of ionizing radiation on the human body"<br /><br />Did you mean to say 1,000 mSv = 1Sv ?? I think you missed a zero. <br /><br />Davidnoreply@blogger.com